In recent times, a number of senior judges have made interventions in the ongoing debate on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg which enforces it. They include Lord Sumption and Lord Reed of the Supreme Court, the recently retired Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, Lord Justice Laws of the Court of Appeal and Judge Paul Mahoney of the Strasbourg Court.
book reviews cases Church of England citizenship conservatism constitutional conventions constitutional principles constitutional reform Crown dependencies devolution electoral reform European Convention on Human Rights European Union executive history House of Commons House of Lords human rights judiciary monarchy Northern Ireland old documents Parliament parliamentary sovereignty prime minister Privy Council referendums Reform Acts religion royal prerogative statutes Wales
Sunday, 22 December 2013
Friday, 26 October 2012
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
England used to have a blasphemy law - or, more precisely, it used to recognise the twin offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel. Yet it is rarely remembered that the purpose of the blasphemy law was as much political as religious. It was aimed against perceived subversion of the law, society and the state rather than at preventing individuals from committing sin in the eyes of God.
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
In a previous post, I examined the recurring theme of the mixed and balanced constitution in English constitutional writings. In this post, I want to look at some of the ancient sources of this theme.
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
This is a rather odd documentary on the hereditary peers in the House of Lords made by the Canadian filmmaker Molly Dineen. The hereditaries were removed from the House in 1999, with the exception of a rump of 92 who remained under a deal struck between the Conservative Lords leader Lord Cranborne and the Labour Government (which opposed the making of the film).